Re: Hard questions (was: Diffserv PIB approved as Informational RFC)
Simon Leinen <[email protected]> 27 Jun 2002 13:08:47 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.diffserv |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> On Tue, 25 Jun 2002 16:42:11 -0400, Dan Grossman <[email protected]> said: > So RFC2836 (which is necessary but not sufficient to the solution to > the problem) should have been done by a trade association? [...] Gee, sometimes it's hard to follow you people when one doesn't know all RFC numbers by heart... fortunately I have an RFC index handy (http://sunsite.cnlab-switch.ch/ftp/doc/standard/rfc/mini-index.html) By the way, RFC 2836 has been superseded by RFC 3140 ("Per Hop Behaviour Identification Codes"). -- Simon. _______________________________________________ diffserv mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diffserv Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/diffserv/current/maillist.html