RE: Alarm MIB implementations
"Sharon Chisholm" <[email protected]> Fri, 29 Apr 2005 13:24:07 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.disman |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <713043CE8B8E1348AF3C546DBE02C1B4033355F8@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com> |
hi Not really. We did observe that probable cause may make more sense associated with the active alarm instance, but that was easily solvable via an extension. Sharon -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Randy Presuhn Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 4:00 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Disman] Alarm MIB implementations Hi - > From: "Sharon Chisholm" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 1:40 PM > Subject: RE: [Disman] Alarm MIB implementations ... > I know of two potential third party management applications > implementations, but I am not sure of their current status or if the > vendors have made this public so I don't want to name them explicitly. > Also based on the private email questions I get, a lot of people are > considering implementations, but I'm not sure if they are looking > device side or management application. > > Plus, of course the work within my own organization. ... Have any issues surfaced in the course of implementation where changes or clarifications to the specification would be helpful? Randy