RE: Alarm MIB implementations

"Sharon Chisholm" <[email protected]> Fri, 29 Apr 2005 13:24:07 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.disman
Message-ID <713043CE8B8E1348AF3C546DBE02C1B4033355F8@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com>
hi

Not really. We did observe that probable cause may make more sense
associated with the active alarm instance, but that was easily solvable via
an extension.

Sharon

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Randy Presuhn
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 4:00 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Disman] Alarm MIB implementations


Hi -

> From: "Sharon Chisholm" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 1:40 PM
> Subject: RE: [Disman] Alarm MIB implementations
...
> I know of two potential third party management applications 
> implementations, but I am not sure of their current status or if the 
> vendors have made this public so I don't want to name them explicitly. 
> Also based on the private email questions I get, a lot of people are 
> considering implementations, but I'm not sure if they are looking 
> device side or management application.
>
> Plus, of course the work within my own organization.
...

Have any issues surfaced in the course of implementation where changes or
clarifications to the specification would be helpful?

Randy