RE: Fw: MIB Doctor review: publishdraft-ietf-disman-remops-mib-v2-06.tx t
"Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)" <[email protected]> Wed, 4 May 2005 14:11:03 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.disman |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <AAB4B3D3CF0F454F98272CBE187FDE2F08334499@is0004avexu1.global.avaya.com> |
I agree with Juergen on this one.Tracepath information, even if read-only, is considered to be privacy sensitive in many environments. To quote from http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ops-mib-review-guidelines-04.txt, Section 3.4: Each specification that defines one or more MIB modules MUST contain a section that discusses security considerations relevant to those modules. This section MUST be patterned after the latest approved template (available at http://www.ops.ietf.org/mib-security.html). In particular, writeable MIB objects that could be especially disruptive if abused MUST be explicitly listed by name and the associated security risks MUST be spelled out; similarly, readable MIB objects that contain especially sensitive information or that raise significant privacy concerns MUST be explicitly listed by name and the reasons for the sensitivity/privacy concerns MUST be explained. It looks like this is one of the cases where the objects 'MUST be explicitly listed by name and the reasons for the sensitivity/privacy concerns MUST be explained.' Regards, Dan > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Randy Presuhn > Sent: 04 May, 2005 6:56 AM > To: Disman > Subject: [Disman] Fw: MIB Doctor review: > publishdraft-ietf-disman-remops-mib-v2-06.tx t > > > Hi - > > Forwarded for your information. > > Randy > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Juergen Schoenwaelder" <[email protected]> .... > > > > 5. Security Considerations > > > > - The following is stated: > > > > However, the only information that might be > > disclosed is the configuration and results of > measurements that are > > performed by implementations of the MIB modules. This > information > > can only be mis-used in conjunction with the mis-use of further > > information. > > > > I am not sure what the last sentence hints at. It sounds > like it is > > trying to make this less a security problem. Note sure > this is true. > > Tracepaths reveals information about paths which some > people tend to > > block (actually becoming more and more popular in enterprise > > networks it seems). > > > > > > -- > > Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen > > <http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/> P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 > Bremen, Germany > > > > >