Re: Some editorial proposals for draft-ietf-disman-event-mib-v2-04.txt
"Randy Presuhn" <[email protected]> Fri, 3 Jun 2005 17:18:49 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.disman |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <000b01c5689a$fbbc4880$7f1afea9@oemcomputer> |
Hi - > From: "Benoit Claise" <[email protected]> > To: "Randy Presuhn" <[email protected]> > Cc: "Disman (E-mail)" <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 4:16 PM > Subject: Re: [Disman] Some editorialproposals fordraft-ietf-disman-event-mib-v2-04.txt ... > >I don't think we need this. > >See the first paragraph of RFC 2021's definition of TimeFilter. > > > > > Right, but whenever we referred to "RMON handling of thresholds", I > thought we were referring to the RMON event/alarm (RFC2819), which > doesn't have the notion of existence? I don't know. I don't feel strongly about this text. > >>2. Section 4. MIB Sections ... > New proposal: Triggers define the conditions that lead to events. > Events may cause notifications, may set MIB objects, or both. > Is this better? ... Much. Randy