Re: Some editorial proposals for draft-ietf-disman-event-mib-v2-04.txt

"Randy Presuhn" <[email protected]> Fri, 3 Jun 2005 17:18:49 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.disman
Message-ID <000b01c5689a$fbbc4880$7f1afea9@oemcomputer>
Hi -

> From: "Benoit Claise" <[email protected]>
> To: "Randy Presuhn" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Disman (E-mail)" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, June 03, 2005 4:16 PM
> Subject: Re: [Disman] Some editorialproposals fordraft-ietf-disman-event-mib-v2-04.txt
...
> >I don't think we need this.
> >See the first paragraph of RFC 2021's definition of TimeFilter.
> >
> >
> Right, but whenever we referred to "RMON handling of thresholds", I
> thought we were referring to the RMON event/alarm (RFC2819), which
> doesn't have the notion of existence?

I don't know.  I don't feel strongly about this text.

> >>2. Section 4.  MIB Sections
...
> New proposal: Triggers define the conditions that lead to events.
> Events may cause notifications, may set MIB objects, or both.
> Is this better?
...

Much.

Randy