RE: Should we close the disman WG?

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Shield [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 4:40 PM
> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> Cc: Randy Presuhn; Disman
> Subject: RE: [Disman] Should we close the disman WG?
> 
> On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 14:04, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
> > I do not believe that there is new work that would require 
> keeping the 
> > WG update.
> 
> Well, I recently put forward a suggestion that the current 
> handling of the three mte*Objects tags is fundamentally 
> flawed, and makes it effectively impossible to combine 
> trigger-based and event-based object tags when building up a 
> notification payload.
> 
> 
> I've spoken briefly with Benoit about this issue, but have 
> otherwise had basically no response to this, or various other 
> questions posed here.
> 
> So I'd suggest that there *is* outstanding work to be done, 
> but possibly not much interest in doing it  :-(

I agree and stand corrected - there were issue that were raised related
to existing documents, and even proposals for new work, but none seemed
to gather the minimal critical mass of interest. 

> 
> 
> 
> >  I assume the list will stay active to answer (hopefully) 
> > clarification questions in the future.
> 
> I admire your optimism.....

One must always believe :-)

> 
> 
> Dave
> 

Dan