Re: Any further remops discussion needed?

--On 7/16/2005 8:39 AM +0200 Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 08:38:54PM -0700, Randy Presuhn wrote:
>
>> Discussion has quieted down, so I'd like to ask the Juergens:
>> JuergenQ: are all your editing instructions clear?

No, there are still issues to be discussed.  I am very sorry that
I did not find time in the last weeks to address them:

Here is the list of things I still need to address:

  - suggesting text to generalize from gethostname/gethostbyaddr
    to getnameinfo/getaddrinfo at several places in the document.

  - explain, why pingCtlRowStatus  and traceRouteCtlRowStatus are
    not required by the respective minimum compliance statements?

  - discuss the usefulness of traceRouteCtlMiscOptions

  - check consistency of compliancy statements concerning
    restrictions to read only

  - update compliancy statement descriptions

I hope I will be able to send messages on all these issues to the
list in the next week.

    Juergen Q.
-- 
Juergen Quittek        [email protected]       Tel: +49 6221 90511-15
NEC Europe Ltd.,       Network Laboratories        Fax: +49 6221 90511-55
Kurfuersten-Anlage 36, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany   http://www.netlab.nec.de