Re: Event MIB object handling - Issue 2

>>>>> On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:54:53 +0200, Benoit Claise <[email protected]> said:

Benoit> As an editor, shall I simply modify the last sentence of the
Benoit> mteObjectsEntry from "Those associated with a trigger come
Benoit> first, then trigger test, then event." to "Those associated
Benoit> with an event come first, then a trigger , then trigger
Benoit> test."?  Feedback?  I'm sure some old timers on the list will
Benoit> object is this is completely wrong :)

I agree with Dave's analysis that the existing functionality is broken
and needs to be fixed.  Thus I think this change is required.

However, since it's likely a major change in functionality it will
have to recycle at proposed?  However, I think it's worth doing in
this case because the alternative is letting it go forward in a broken
state that renders half the purpose of the MIB unusable in the way it
should be used.


-- 
"In the bathtub of history the truth is harder to hold than the soap,
 and much more difficult to find."  -- Terry Pratchett