RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-disman-remops-mib-v2-07.txt

OK, so unless you tell me otherwise, I am going to proceed
on this document and assume WG consensus.

Bert

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Randy Presuhn [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 08:54
> To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
> Cc: Disman
> Subject: Re: [Disman] I-D 
> ACTION:draft-ietf-disman-remops-mib-v2-07.txt 
> 
> 
> Hi Bert -
> 
> > From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email protected]>
> > To: "Randy Presuhn (E-mail)" <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 8:14 AM
> > Subject: FW: [Disman] I-D 
> ACTION:draft-ietf-disman-remops-mib-v2-07.txt 
> >
> 
> > Randy,
> > is this now back on my plate, or does it need another check by WG?
> > 
> > We also still need to do IETF Last Call, and so we need to 
> start hurry-ing 
> > if we want to finish this before I step down in March.
> ...
> 
> The changes were posted to the disman WG mailing list, and 
> there was no dissent.
> The request is for consideration as PROPOSED STANDARD.
> We would have liked to have gone for DRAFT, but I was only able
> to obtain adequate implementation reports for two of the three
> MIB modules in this document.
> 
> Randy, disman chair
> 
> 
> 
>