Re: disman remops

Hi -

> From: "Juergen Quittek" <[email protected]>
> To: "Randy Presuhn" <[email protected]>; "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Dan Romascanu (E-mail)" <[email protected]>; "Disman" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 5:54 PM
> Subject: Re: disman remops
...
> Wouldn't it be helpful to be more explicit, for example, by appending
> 
>              The value of traceRouteHopsHopIndex is not necessarily
>              identical with the number of the hop on the traced path.
> 
> to the description?
...

I have no problem with the idea of being more explicit.  So
how about this:

OLD:
           "Specifies the hop index for a traceroute hop.  Values
           for this object with respect to the same
           traceRouteCtlOwnerIndex and traceRouteCtlTestName
           MUST start at 1 and increase monotonically.

NEW:
           "Specifies the hop index for a traceroute hop.  Values
           for this object with respect to the same
           traceRouteCtlOwnerIndex and traceRouteCtlTestName
           MUST start at 1, and be given increasing  values for
           subsequent hops.  The value of traceRouteHopsHopIndex
           is not necessarily the number of the hop on the traced path.

Ok?

Randy