Disman to conclude? (waS: RE: RFC 4560 on Definitions of Managed Objects for RemotePing, Traceroute, and Lookup Operations)
"Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)" <[email protected]> Mon, 3 Jul 2006 09:08:36 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.disman,gmane.ietf.ops-nm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <AAB4B3D3CF0F454F98272CBE187FDE2F0AC160A2@is0004avexu1.global.avaya.com> |
Unless other further comments or suggestions will be brought to the list in the next few days I suggest that we take this course of action. We can leave the list active for queries and discussions. Dan > -----Original Message----- > From: Randy Presuhn [mailto:[email protected]] > > Since there appears to be little interest in producing > implementation reports with sufficient detail to advance the > WG's other documents, I think declaring the WG concluded > would be a reasonable course of action. > > Randy > >