RFC 3877 and IPv6

Greetings,

In the version of RFC 3877 available at datatracker.ietf.org, I noticed =20
that the alarmActiveVariableValueType does not include either =20
InetAddressType or InetAddress in the enumeration which does not allow =20
you to indicate an IPv6 address in the alarmActiveVariableTable.  The =20
alarmActiveEngineAddress is expressed according to RFC 2851, so that is =20
not a problem.


Will alarmActiveVariableValueType be extended to include =20
InetAddressType and InetAddress (along with matching =20
alarmActiveVariableInetAddressTypeVal and =20
alarmActiveVariableInetAddressVal objects in AlarmActiveVariableEntry)?
Is there a recommended work-around?

Thank you!

--=20
Mark A. Flacy