RE: Disman session in Seoul

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.disman
Message-ID <AAB4B3D3CF0F454F98272CBE187FDE2F056B2615@is0004avexu1.global.avaya.com>
Randy,

Can you help us with a list of issues and pointer to the relevant drafts? I know that they may have been announced on the list, but getting them listed in one mail can help.

One issue which IMO does not fall under the scope of Disman is the latest proposal by Shailaja Yadawad on statistical sampling. 

Regards,

Dan



> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On 
> Behalf Of Randy Presuhn
> Sent: 14 February, 2004 12:23 AM
> To: Disman (E-mail)
> Subject: [Disman] Disman session in Seoul
> 
> 
> Hi -
> 
> There has been some recent discussion about possible new
> work in the disman working group.  There is also the question
> of advancing some of the specifications that have come from this
> working group.  In order to help reach some kind of closure,
> I've requested a one-hour slot for disman in Seoul.
> 
> Disman's session is *currently* scheduled on Tuesday, March second
> in the 17:00-18:00 time slot.  Since the agenda has not yet been
> finalized, this date/time may change, so watch for the final agenda.
> 
> I'd like to get a good sense of whether there is sufficient 
> interest and
> need to continue work as a working group.  If there is, I'd 
> like to know
> which items enjoy adequate support.  At our last face-to-face meeting,
> there seemed to be some interest in advancing some of our documents
> to Draft Standard, but follow-through has been uneven.  Of course,
> I *strongly* encourage folks to get those discussions underway on
> this mailing list, so we can use our meeting time 
> productively and provide
> our AD with the information he needs to make a decision on 
> how to proceed.
> 
> Please post to this mailing list any other pertinent topics 
> you would like to
> discuss, so I can submit an agenda in time for the Tuesday, 
> February 24th
> deadline.
> 
> Lack of discussion will be interpreted as disinterest, and I 
> do not want
> to waste resources on uninteresting work.
> 
> Randy
> 
> 
> 
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.