Re: Disman session in Seoul

Randy,

In January Giorgio posted our draft of the Check MIB
(draft-nunzi-check-mib-00.txt), a light-weight combination
of the Event MIB and the Expression MIB for remote health
check operations on a large set of small managed devices.

If there is a disman session in Seoul, I would like to present this
MIB module and ask if there is any interest in standardizing it.

Thanks,

    Jürgen
-- 
Juergen Quittek        [email protected]        Tel: +49 6221 90511-15
NEC Europe Ltd.,       Network Laboratories        Fax: +49 6221 90511-55
Kurfuersten-Anlage 36, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany   http://www.ccrle.nec.de


--On 13.02.2004 14:23 Uhr -0800 Randy Presuhn wrote:

> Hi -
>
> There has been some recent discussion about possible new
> work in the disman working group.  There is also the question
> of advancing some of the specifications that have come from this
> working group.  In order to help reach some kind of closure,
> I've requested a one-hour slot for disman in Seoul.
>
> Disman's session is *currently* scheduled on Tuesday, March second
> in the 17:00-18:00 time slot.  Since the agenda has not yet been
> finalized, this date/time may change, so watch for the final agenda.
>
> I'd like to get a good sense of whether there is sufficient interest and
> need to continue work as a working group.  If there is, I'd like to know
> which items enjoy adequate support.  At our last face-to-face meeting,
> there seemed to be some interest in advancing some of our documents
> to Draft Standard, but follow-through has been uneven.  Of course,
> I *strongly* encourage folks to get those discussions underway on
> this mailing list, so we can use our meeting time productively and provide
> our AD with the information he needs to make a decision on how to proceed.
>
> Please post to this mailing list any other pertinent topics you would like to
> discuss, so I can submit an agenda in time for the Tuesday, February 24th
> deadline.
>
> Lack of discussion will be interpreted as disinterest, and I do not want
> to waste resources on uninteresting work.
>
> Randy
>
>
>