RE: WG last call on draft-ietf-disman-remops-mib-v2-01.txt

Hi -

> From: Eduardo Cardona <[email protected]>
> Sent: Mar 2, 2004 9:25 AM
> To: Randy Presuhn <[email protected]>, [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [Disman] WG last call on draft-ietf-disman-remops-mib-v2-01.txt
...
> One simple note, I tough last call was March 5th 

No, it was supposed to end March 2.  However, I'm not
going to hand it to our AD until I can be reasonably sure
that it has received adequate review.

> We at Cablelabs are interested in adding a simplified compliance
> statement for ad-hoc procedure call instead of a user entry schecule
> entry, so an user can do a one time execution e.g PING

It would have been nice to have learned of this earlier, rather than
during WG last call.

> The draft we had is almost complete, 
> Would be that an opportunity to add that? I can post that tomorrow in
> the list if compeling 
...

I'd like to have this discussion sooner rather than later, so please make
your specific proposal as quickly as you can.  My opinion as a technical
contributor is that the case for these changes would need to be fairly
compelling if they would result in the remote operations MIB cycling
at proposed rather than advancing to draft standard.  As working group
chair, I want to ensure that whatever course we take reflects WG
consensus.  So, balancing the need for bringing this to a conclusion with
the need to ensure that the technical issues are properly considered,
I'll entertain discussion of this issue ("ad hoc procedure call") until
Friday noon (Korean Time).  Shortly thereafter I'll make a call on
whether there is consensus to modify the draft regarding this specific
proposal.

Randy