Re: Protocol Action: 'Alarm MIB' to Proposed Standard
"Randy Presuhn" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.disman |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <000601c40b8b$f3a73dc0$7f1afea9@oemcomputer> |
Hi - > From: "Lam, Hing-Kam (Kam)" <[email protected]> > To: "'Randy Presuhn'" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 10:13 AM > Subject: RE: [Disman] Protocol Action: 'Alarm MIB' to Proposed Standard ... > I assume the 'ARC MIB' now can move forward, as it is pending on the approval of the 'Alarm MIB'. ... The ARC MIB was already in the RFC editor queue, and this was the only pending reference, so it's just a matter of time now before you get to AUTH48. Randy