Re: Log MIB Implementation Survey

"Randy Presuhn" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.disman
Message-ID <008201c4531b$92121ee0$7f1afea9@oemcomputer>
Hi -

Two months have passed, and I've seen NO response.
I know there are implementations out there, but if I don't
see any response, I think there's no point in attempting
to update / progress this work.  Comments welcomed.

Randy

> From: "Randy Presuhn" <[email protected]>
> To: "Disman (E-mail)" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 12:29 PM
> Subject: [Disman] Log MIB Implementation Survey
>
> Hi -
>
> Here is the Implementation Survey for RFC 3014, the Log MIB.
> Please send responses to [email protected] , or, if you would like your implementation
> to remain anonymous for the implementation report, to the WG chair at
> [email protected].
>
> =================================================
>
> Implementation Survey for RFC 3014,
> Notification Log MIB
>
> Module: NOTIFICATION-LOG-MIB
> Implementation Source:
> Management Application / Agent:
>
>
> GROUPs:
> notificationLogConfigGroup (y/n): _
> notificationLogStatsGroup (y/n): _
> notificationLogLogGroup (y/n):
> notificationLogDateGroup (y/n): _
>
>
> OBJECTs:
> nlmConfigGlobalEntryLimit (rw/ro): _
>                           lower bound: _______
>                           upper bound: _______
> nlmConfigLogEntryLimit (rw/ro): _
>                         lower bound: ________
>                         upper bound: ________
> nlmConfigLogEntryStatus: (rw/ro): _
>
>
> Deployment / Operational Experience:
>
>
> Comments:
>
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.