Re: Log MIB Implementation Survey
"Randy Presuhn" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.disman |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <008201c4531b$92121ee0$7f1afea9@oemcomputer> |
Hi - Two months have passed, and I've seen NO response. I know there are implementations out there, but if I don't see any response, I think there's no point in attempting to update / progress this work. Comments welcomed. Randy > From: "Randy Presuhn" <[email protected]> > To: "Disman (E-mail)" <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 12:29 PM > Subject: [Disman] Log MIB Implementation Survey > > Hi - > > Here is the Implementation Survey for RFC 3014, the Log MIB. > Please send responses to [email protected] , or, if you would like your implementation > to remain anonymous for the implementation report, to the WG chair at > [email protected]. > > ================================================= > > Implementation Survey for RFC 3014, > Notification Log MIB > > Module: NOTIFICATION-LOG-MIB > Implementation Source: > Management Application / Agent: > > > GROUPs: > notificationLogConfigGroup (y/n): _ > notificationLogStatsGroup (y/n): _ > notificationLogLogGroup (y/n): > notificationLogDateGroup (y/n): _ > > > OBJECTs: > nlmConfigGlobalEntryLimit (rw/ro): _ > lower bound: _______ > upper bound: _______ > nlmConfigLogEntryLimit (rw/ro): _ > lower bound: ________ > upper bound: ________ > nlmConfigLogEntryStatus: (rw/ro): _ > > > Deployment / Operational Experience: > > > Comments: > > >