RE: FW: Communication of Alarm Info Workging Group last callcomplete

I suggest the following changes:

In Section 3.1.3

OLD

  In this document we define one new Error Code.  The Error Code uses
   the value TBA (by IANA) and is referred to as "Alarms".  The values
   used in the Error Values field are the same as the values used for
   IANAItuProbableCause in the Alarm MIB [ALARM-MIB].  Note these values
   are managed by IANA, see http://www.iana.org.

NEW:


  In this document we define one new Error Code.  The Error Code uses
   the value TBA (by IANA) and is referred to as " GMPLS Alarms".  The values
   used in the Error Values field are the same as the values used for
   IANAItuProbableCause in the Alarm MIB [ALARM-MIB].  Note these values
   are managed by IANA, see the IANA Considerations Section

IN the IANA Considerations Section:

OLD:

   Additionally, Section 3.1.3 defines a new Error Code.  The Error Code
   is "Alarms" and uses Error Values defined in the Alarm MIB [ALARM-
   MIB].  The suggested Error code value is 28.

NEW:

Additionally, Section 3.1.3 defines a new Error Code.  The Error Code
   is "GMPLS Alarms" and uses Error Values similar to  IANAItuProbableCause
   defined in the Alarm MIB [ALARM-MIB].  The Error code value allocated by IANA 
   is TBD, see http://www.iana.org.


In Section 6.1

OLD:

[ALARM-MIB] Chisholm, S., Romascanu, D., "Alarm MIB",
            draft-ietf-disman-alarm-mib-18.txt, February 2004

NEW: 

[ALARM-MIB] Chisholm, S., Romascanu, D., "Alarm MIB",
            RFC 3877, September 2004

 

What I suggest is to require from IANA a code value for 'GMPLS Alarms' , and then use the text as suggested.

Regards,

Dan



> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
> Sent: 04 October, 2004 3:21 PM
> To: Disman (E-mail) (E-mail)
> Cc: Adrian Farrel (E-mail)
> Subject: [Disman] FW: Communication of Alarm Info Workging 
> Group last callcomplete
> 
> 
> So the WG chair agrees it would have been goor to check with 
> DISMAN WG.
> I guess if we do review quickly, that that would be good.
> 
> Bert
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 15:17
> To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
> Subject: Re: Communication of Alarm Info Workging Group last call
> complete
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Yes, I guess that would have been sensible. Thanks for catching it.
> 
> Of course, it there are any comments arising, we will fold them in.
> 
> Adrian
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email protected]>
> To: "'Adrian Farrel'" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 2:12 PM
> Subject: RE: Communication of Alarm Info Workging Group last 
> call complete
> 
> 
> > Did you tell DISMAN WG (doing ALARM MIB) that this last call
> > had been going on? I would have done so myself, but I guess
> > I missed the start of the last call.
> > 
> > Anyway, I have forwarded the below, just in case.
> > 
> > Bert
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2004 22:29
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: Communication of Alarm Info Workging Group last 
> call complete
> > > 
> > > 
> > > This email concludes the Working Group last call on 
> > > draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-alarm-spec
> > > 
> > > Authors,
> > > 
> > > Please address the comments made during last call by updating 
> > > the draft and republishing.
> > > Please inform the list of any changes you make.
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Adrian
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> 
>