Re: Expression MIB

Hi -

> From: "Glenn Mansfield Keeni" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 4:48 AM
> Subject: [Disman] Expression MIB
>

> Hi,
>   It seems that the Expression MIB has not found much interest in the
> community. I have probably missed the discussion on the demerits of the
> MIB.
>   Can someone tell me or point me to any discussion about what went wrong
> or what is bad about this MIB?
>   I personally find the Expression MIB a good and useful piece of work.
...

At this stage, interest is gauged by implementation reports
and discussion.  If you'd like this work to be able to advance,
submitting a report on your implementation would help.
(Please note the attached message from over three months ago!)
When there are no implementation reports, even from groups
that were its biggest proponents and who have probably implemented
it, claims that the MIB module is "good and useful" ring hollow.
RFC 2026 section 4.1.2 is quite clear on what needs to happen before
this work can advance.

Randy
disman WG chair

==================================
Status:  U
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71])
 by james.mail.atl.earthlink.net (EarthLink SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 1bAsxS7yG3Nl3r10
 Wed, 16 Jun 2004 01:01:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org)
 by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32)
 id 1BaSK8-0007kV-Va; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 00:46:56 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org)
 by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BaS9J-0004II-LH
 for [email protected]; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 00:35:45 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1])
 by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA14732
 for <[email protected]>; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 00:35:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx)
 by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BaS9H-00063M-GV
 for [email protected]; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 00:35:43 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12)
 id 1BaNPW-0007Pk-00
 for [email protected]; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 19:32:12 -0400
Received: from flamingo.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.232])
 by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BaKym-0003js-00
 for [email protected]; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 16:56:24 -0400
Received: from h-68-164-78-145.snvacaid.dynamic.covad.net ([68.164.78.145]
 helo=oemcomputer)
 by flamingo.mail.pas.earthlink.net with smtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
 id 1BaKym-0000XQ-00
 for [email protected]; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 13:56:25 -0700
Message-ID: <007d01c4531b$5a4043c0$7f1afea9@oemcomputer>
From: "Randy Presuhn" <[email protected]>
To: "Disman \(E-mail\)" <[email protected]>
References: <00c201c41b44$6d116880$7f1afea9@oemcomputer>
Subject: Re: [Disman] Expression MIB Implementation Survey
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 13:57:20 -0700
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on
 ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
X-BeenThere: [email protected]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Management <disman.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/disman>,
 <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/disman>
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/disman>,
 <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
Sender: [email protected]
Errors-To: [email protected]
X-ELNK-AV: 0

Hi -

Two months have passed, and I haven't seen a single response.
Suggestions?

Randy

> From: "Randy Presuhn" <[email protected]>
> To: "Disman (E-mail)" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 12:30 PM
> Subject: [Disman] Expression MIB Implementation Survey
>

> Hi -
>
> Here is the Implementation Survey for RFC 2982, the Expression MIB.
> Please send responses to [email protected] , or, if you would like your implementation
> to remain anonymous for the implementation report, to the WG chair at
> [email protected].
>
> =================================================
>
> Implementat Survey for RFC 2982,
> Distributed Management Expression MIB
>
>
> Implementation Source:
> Management Application / Agent:
> Module: DISMAN-EXPRESSION-MIB
>
> GROUPs:
> dismanExpressionResourceGroup (y/n): _
> dismanExpressionDefinitionGroup (y/n): _
> dismanExpressionValueGroup (y,n): _
>
> OBJECTs:
> expResourceDeltaMinimum full range supported (y/n): _
> expObjectSampleType deltas supported (y/n): _
> expObjectIDWildcard wildcard supported (y/n): _
> expObjectDiscontinuityIDWildcard wildcard supported (y/n): _
> expObjectConditionalWildcard deltas/wildcards supported (y/n): _
>
>
> Deployment / Operational Experience:
>
>
> Comments:
>
>
>