Re: Expression MIB

Hi,
   I have just filled up and sent the details of our partial
implementation of the DISMAN-EXPRESSION-MIB.
   Are there any  pointers to discussion on the pros and cons
of the DISMAN-EXPRESSION-MIB ?

   Glenn

> Hi -
> 
> 
>>From: "Glenn Mansfield Keeni" <[email protected]>
>>To: <[email protected]>
>>Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 4:48 AM
>>Subject: [Disman] Expression MIB
>>
> 
> 
>>Hi,
>>  It seems that the Expression MIB has not found much interest in the
>>community. I have probably missed the discussion on the demerits of the
>>MIB.
>>  Can someone tell me or point me to any discussion about what went wrong
>>or what is bad about this MIB?
>>  I personally find the Expression MIB a good and useful piece of work.
> 
> ...
> 
> At this stage, interest is gauged by implementation reports
> and discussion.  If you'd like this work to be able to advance,
> submitting a report on your implementation would help.
> (Please note the attached message from over three months ago!)
> When there are no implementation reports, even from groups
> that were its biggest proponents and who have probably implemented
> it, claims that the MIB module is "good and useful" ring hollow.
> RFC 2026 section 4.1.2 is quite clear on what needs to happen before
> this work can advance.
> 
> Randy
> disman WG chair
> 
> ==================================
> Status:  U
> Return-Path: <[email protected]>
> Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71])
>  by james.mail.atl.earthlink.net (EarthLink SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 1bAsxS7yG3Nl3r10
>  Wed, 16 Jun 2004 01:01:08 -0400 (EDT)
> Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org)
>  by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32)
>  id 1BaSK8-0007kV-Va; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 00:46:56 -0400
> Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org)
>  by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BaS9J-0004II-LH
>  for [email protected]; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 00:35:45 -0400
> Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1])
>  by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA14732
>  for <[email protected]>; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 00:35:42 -0400 (EDT)
> Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx)
>  by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BaS9H-00063M-GV
>  for [email protected]; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 00:35:43 -0400
> Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12)
>  id 1BaNPW-0007Pk-00
>  for [email protected]; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 19:32:12 -0400
> Received: from flamingo.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.232])
>  by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BaKym-0003js-00
>  for [email protected]; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 16:56:24 -0400
> Received: from h-68-164-78-145.snvacaid.dynamic.covad.net ([68.164.78.145]
>  helo=oemcomputer)
>  by flamingo.mail.pas.earthlink.net with smtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
>  id 1BaKym-0000XQ-00
>  for [email protected]; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 13:56:25 -0700
> Message-ID: <007d01c4531b$5a4043c0$7f1afea9@oemcomputer>
> From: "Randy Presuhn" <[email protected]>
> To: "Disman \(E-mail\)" <[email protected]>
> References: <00c201c41b44$6d116880$7f1afea9@oemcomputer>
> Subject: Re: [Disman] Expression MIB Implementation Survey
> Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 13:57:20 -0700
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on
>  ietf-mx.ietf.org
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
> X-BeenThere: [email protected]
> X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
> Precedence: list
> List-Id: Distributed Management <disman.ietf.org>
> List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/disman>,
>  <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
> List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/disman>
> List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
> List-Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
> List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/disman>,
>  <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
> Sender: [email protected]
> Errors-To: [email protected]
> X-ELNK-AV: 0
> 
> Hi -
> 
> Two months have passed, and I haven't seen a single response.
> Suggestions?
> 
> Randy
> 
> 
>>From: "Randy Presuhn" <[email protected]>
>>To: "Disman (E-mail)" <[email protected]>
>>Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 12:30 PM
>>Subject: [Disman] Expression MIB Implementation Survey
>>
> 
> 
>>Hi -
>>
>>Here is the Implementation Survey for RFC 2982, the Expression MIB.
>>Please send responses to [email protected] , or, if you would like your implementation
>>to remain anonymous for the implementation report, to the WG chair at
>>[email protected].
>>
>>=================================================
>>
>>Implementat Survey for RFC 2982,
>>Distributed Management Expression MIB
>>
>>
>>Implementation Source:
>>Management Application / Agent:
>>Module: DISMAN-EXPRESSION-MIB
>>
>>GROUPs:
>>dismanExpressionResourceGroup (y/n): _
>>dismanExpressionDefinitionGroup (y/n): _
>>dismanExpressionValueGroup (y,n): _
>>
>>OBJECTs:
>>expResourceDeltaMinimum full range supported (y/n): _
>>expObjectSampleType deltas supported (y/n): _
>>expObjectIDWildcard wildcard supported (y/n): _
>>expObjectDiscontinuityIDWildcard wildcard supported (y/n): _
>>expObjectConditionalWildcard deltas/wildcards supported (y/n): _
>>
>>
>>Deployment / Operational Experience:
>>
>>
>>Comments:
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>