Re: Request to publish draft-ietf-disman-remops-mib-v2-06.txt

Bert,



It might be helpful to you to check the differences between RFC 2925 

and the current draft version -06.  Please find the complete change

log at



ftp://ftp.netlab.nec.de/pub/internet-drafts/changes-rfc2925-06.txt



Merry Christmas,



    Juergen





> Hi Bert -

> 

> Yes, as disman WG chair I'm requesting that you take

> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-disman-remops-mib-v2-06.txt

> to the IESG for consideration as PROPOSED STANDARD.

> This would obsolete RFC 2925.  It went through an extended

> WG last call period, and no issues remain to be resolved.

> The most significant change is the additional conformance material

> for the ping capability, added to meet the needs of the ipcdn

> working group.

> 

> We would have liked to have gone for DRAFT, but I was only able

> to obtain adequate implementation reports for two of the three

> MIB modules in this document.

> 

> Randy

> 

> > From: "Juergen Quittek" <[email protected]>

> > To: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email protected]>

> > Cc: "Randy Presuhn" <[email protected]>

> > Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 9:44 AM

> > Subject: RE: remaining remops MIBs issue

> >

> 

> > Bert,

> >

> > Thanks a lot!

> >

> > I will make a note on the nit and make sure that it will be fixed latest

> > during the 48 hours call.

> >

> > Randy, can we now go on with the I-D and pass it to Bert for AD

> > and IESG review?

> >

> > Thanks,

> >

> >     Juergen

> >

> >

> > --On 21.12.2004 16:22 Uhr +0100 Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:

> >

> > > I think that your security considerations section

> > > is fine. I can't speak for the security ADs themselves,

> > > but I see no problem.

> > >

> > > One nit:

> > >  insecure environments it is RECOMMENDED that the MIBs defined within

> > >  this memo not be supported.

> > >

> > > s/MIBs/MIB modules/

> > >

> > > But it is really a nit.

> > >

> > > Bert

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >> -----Original Message-----

> > >> From: Juergen Quittek [mailto:[email protected]]

> > >> Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2004 16:55

> > >> To: [email protected]

> > >> Cc: Randy Presuhn

> > >> Subject: remaining remops MIBs issue

> > >>

> > >>

> > >> Hi Bert,

> > >>

> > >> There is one remaining issue concerning the remops MIB modules.

> > >> The Section on security considerations does not exactly match

> > >> the boilerplate.

> > >>

> > >> The boilerplate requests each writeable object to be discussed

> > >> individually concerning its security threats.  However, the

> > >> remops MIB modules are full of writeable objects and I think

> > >> the Security Considerations are much better to read, if the

> > >> section is structured per threat rather than per object.

> > >>

> > >> Could you please check if you share this view and if this

> > >> 'violation' of the guidelines for MIB modules is acceptable

> > >> in case of this document.  Please find it at

> > >> <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-disman-remops-

> > >> mib-v2-06.txt>.

> > >>

> > >> Thanks,

> > >>

> > >>     Juergen

> > >> --

> > >> Juergen Quittek        [email protected]       Tel: +49

> > >> 6221 90511-15

> > >> NEC Europe Ltd.,       Network Laboratories        Fax: +49

> > >> 6221 90511-55

> > >> Kurfuersten-Anlage 36, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany

> > > http://www.netlab.nec.de

> >

> >

> >

> >

> 

> 

> 

> 

-- 
„