Re: The state of DNS support, was Deprecating SPF
Måns Nilsson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dnsext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Subject: Re: [dnsext] The state of DNS support, was Deprecating SPF Date: Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 08:12:58PM -0000 Quoting John Levine ([email protected]): > >> PS: Something like my dns extension proposal should allow providers to > >> fix the new RR configuration problem once and for all, so I've always > >> been surprised at the hostile reception to it. > > > >Will it or can it work with Microsoft DNS servers? They are part of > >the world too. > > I don't see why not, if Microsoft wanted to implement it. Which is sort of interesting thing to read when we've heard repetitions ad nauseam that advocate broken design because Microsoft will never implement anything without being forced to by procurement rules. (IMNSHO the DNSSEC "support" in 2008 Server is just there to check the boxes for USGOV procurement rules. I think. Noone reasonably sane runs DNSSEC on that. ) -- Måns Nilsson primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina MN-1334-RIPE +46 705 989668 I can't decide which WRONG TURN to make first!! I wonder if BOB GUCCIONE has these problems! _______________________________________________ dnsext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlIaMIMACgkQ02/pMZDM1cXxUACfapf1XY/RJa4mTu1m8ABvFPkB Df4AmQEOvpavxFOzVw/HfVbcFxCuAqp+ =zybA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----