Re: The state of DNS support, was Deprecating SPF
Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dnsext |
|---|---|
| Organization | Brandenburg InternetWorking |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/25/2013 3:52 PM, David Conrad wrote: > On Aug 25, 2013, at 3:42 PM, Dave Crocker <[email protected]> wrote: >> One last time: when has revising a spec altered the further use of features that had so far gained little adoption? > > > 3225 revising 2535 and/or 403x replacing 2535? 1. Given how poor the adoption of DNSSec continues to be, are you sure you want to offer that as an exemplar of success? 2. Given how problematic /any/ adoption of DNSSec was back then and that it only started to gain significant traction after massive additional work and in much more recent years, I guess I don't see how this qualifies as the type of example I was asking for. On 8/25/2013 3:28 PM, Andras Salamon wrote: > ISC and > Nominum seem to add new RRtypes to BIND whenever an RFC is published ... > So we do have at least an existence proof that there are vendors > that proactively respond to standards. Please re-read my query. This wasn't what I was asking about. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ dnsext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext