Re: The state of DNS support, was Deprecating SPF
Ted Lemon <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dnsext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Aug 25, 2013, at 6:28 PM, Andras Salamon <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't know whether there are many examples or not, but ISC and > Nominum seem to add new RRtypes to BIND whenever an RFC is published > defining them, regardless of who employs the authors of the RFC. > Last I checked, variants of BIND ran a large proportion of publicly > visible DNS servers on the Internet. Nominum's DNS servers (we have an authoritative server and a caching resolver, which are separate products) do not share any code with BIND. The problem here is not DNS server vendors—it is consumers of SPF records. _______________________________________________ dnsext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext