Re: The state of DNS support, was Deprecating SPF
David Conrad <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dnsext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Aug 27, 2013, at 7:44 AM, Nicholas Weaver <[email protected]> wrote: > Thus it really is that the major problem is provisioning, not transport, of unknown DNS types. I suspect one of the problems here is that in the universe of mediocrity that is the underlying infrastructure upon which applications that use the DNS rely, you have a bell curve of sorts of what works and what doesn't. As a result, when you get into arguments about whether a protocol feature can be used, people can trot out the 5 sigma extremes and say e.g., "see, doesn't work - we have to use TXT". They're not necessarily wrong, but it does suggest that the ossification of the DNS is pretty much complete... Regards, -drc _______________________________________________ dnsext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 495 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSHMkxAAoJENV6ebf0/4rXHgMIAJi8SEQla6PW9sQcWNj9x45w UoBVmMD9qwNI1dqIjBxqENAuArNOeB0g0qE0hgSkdzuWkJCrYHkC9F+HlgTYqroG 4UgnHEziMH7Cmgzj0OwH8+0WLI9oOQGq/7qt7c9IWWo7dp+gA7zZdMHs3CpmmvnU DgZ3t/qTTHUdUNZHUUz30RCXVTaEV+jW/UA+xPrcULElUXAmAWMarA/CRFq5j1H1 7RWaokBVf1L/yk0kUj5LuTYYD7WXrbCh62lTHG9Xlvs49ZbdhUhLB9jsp0NxNeo4 QXH/DNW7VkS/F2bnccDdUO/7ZXgp+1yz/TMPNJ4nnMlJeL6pjiDxuGM9watSNLs= =yy8+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----