Re: The state of DNS support, was Deprecating SPF
"Jiankang Yao" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dnsext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
From: Douglas Otis Date: 2013-08-28 13:10 To: Jay Daley CC: [email protected] Group Subject: Re: [dnsext] The state of DNS support, was Deprecating SPF >Dear Jay, >The current SPF specification may require receivers to emit as many as 222 DNS transactions in an effort to aggregate required data. In contrast, a well considered APL scheme should offer the needed data within one RRset transaction in binary form to support a store and forward protocol. > > 222 DNS transactions ? any example about it? _______________________________________________ dnsext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext