Re: RFC 5507 issues relating to draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19
Ted Lemon <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dnsext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Aug 28, 2013, at 8:53 AM, S Moonesamy <[email protected]> wrote: > As a note to Ted Lemon I would appreciate if discussion of the topic on [email protected] could be considered as off-topic. dnsext is a discussion list for a closed working group. If members of the mailing list wish to participate in an IETF last call, they must do so on the IETF mailing list, not on the dnsext mailing list. I have been following all three lists during the IETF last call, and am sure that the points raised on dnsext were also raised both in the spfbis working group last call and on the IETF mailing list, so I don't think this should be a problem. If someone on the dnsext mailing list does not agree with this assessment, they should talk to me about it. _______________________________________________ dnsext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext