Re: Extending UPDATE to add/remove zones
Jay Daley <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dnsext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 17/10/2013, at 11:16 AM, Mark Andrews <[email protected]> wrote: > 1. All RRs in the file should have the same class. Great thanks - so overloading class to signify deletion can't be used at the zone level as there is no wriggle room at all. That still leaves the following question (it was after all you that said we should extend UPDATE instead of defining another opcode): >> And what would your solution be to signifying that a zone is to be = >> deleted? Without one we have to abandon extending UPDATE and burn an = >> opcode. Jay -- Jay Daley Chief Executive .nz Registry Services (New Zealand Domain Name Registry Limited) desk: +64 4 931 6977 mobile: +64 21 678840 linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/jaydaley _______________________________________________ dnsext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext