Re: Extending UPDATE to add/remove zones

Mark Andrews <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.dnsext
Message-ID <[email protected]>
In message <[email protected]>, Jay Daley writes
:
> And what would your solution be to signifying that a zone is to be
> deleted?  Without one we have to abandon extending UPDATE and burn an
> opcode.
>
> Jay

Add zone:
Zone: <zname> <class> NS
Update: <aname> <ttl> <class> SOA .....
	<rest of initial zone>
Additional:
master TXT [port=value] [A=value] [AAAA=value] [key=name[:alg:secret]] [name=name]
key TXT [key=name[:algorithm:secret]]
port TXT [port=value]
allow-transfer TXT <TBD>
allow-query TXT <TBD>
allow-update TXT <TBD>

Delete zone:
Zone: <zname> <class> NS
Update: <aname> <ttl> ANY SOA

The use of type NS in the zone section indicates that this is a whole of zone
operation.
 
Mark

> --
> Jay Daley
> Chief Executive
> .nz Registry Services (New Zealand Domain Name Registry Limited)
> desk: +64 4 931 6977
> mobile: +64 21 678840
> linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/jaydaley

-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: [email protected]
_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.