Re: New Version Notification for draft-wouters-edns-tcp-keepalive-00.txt (fwd)
Ray Bellis <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dnsext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <53F00E5CD8B2E34C81C0C89EB0B4FE732DED54D6@wds-exc1.okna.nominet.org.uk> |
On 18 Oct 2013, at 11:40, Tony Finch <[email protected]> wrote: > An RFC 5966 server supports persistent TCP but does not advertise this > fact. It shouldn't have to - every DNS server should already support persistent TCP. Mostly, all that 5966 did was clarify the requirements to support TCP *at all* and drop the minimum idle time. The use of an individual TCP session per query is client habit, and in no way mandated by anything in the earlier DNS documents. Ray _______________________________________________ dnsext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext