Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-wouters-edns-tcp-keepalive-00.txt (fwd)
Mark Andrews <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dnsext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In message <[email protected]>, Paul Wouters w rites: > On Fri, 18 Oct 2013, Tony Finch wrote: > > >>> I am worried that this will make edns-tcp-keepalive clients perform > >>> unnecessarily badly when talking to RFC 5966 servers, > >> > >> could you explain how? > > > > An RFC 5966 server supports persistent TCP but does not advertise this > > fact. > > I hope to have some measurements done in time for Vancouver to see what > the percentage of queries/servers is where this is a problem. That could > help assess whether or not we still need a special indication via edns > or not. Why? Clients should be able to handle the connection being closed unexpectedly and retry any uncompleted queries. > Paul > _______________________________________________ > dnsext mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [email protected] _______________________________________________ dnsext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext