Re: Naked domain resolution with DNSSEC
Dave Lawrence <[email protected]> Wed, 23 Oct 2013 10:55:27 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dnsext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Kumar Ashutosh writes: > Coming back to the original question, the migration from contoso.com > to new_contoso.com is a fairly common scenario. Are there any guidance > on how to achieve such a migration. One argument can be that the > authoritative server for contoso.com should not keep CNAME records at > (.) zone apex. In that case how is the admin supposed to handle such > migrations and still support Naked domain resolutions. Unfortunately the best practice answer here is still to maintain the two zones in parallel. "Use DNAME!" should be the answer, but unfortunately there are a sufficient number of issues with operational deployment of DNAME that it can't really be relied upon, at least not during an active migration. As Andrew Sullivan said, CNAME is right out. Depending on the hosting server software, there are some easy ways to keep both zones absolutely in sync. I realize I'm replying to folks @microsoft.com right now, and unfortunately my knowledge of MS's auth DNS service is not current. However, with other servers (BIND for example) you can just point two different zone names at the same master file. Names in rdata that point within the zone can just be made to be fully qualified by the destination zone name. _______________________________________________ dnsext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext