Re: Naked domain resolution with DNSSEC

In message <[email protected]>, Andrew Sullivan writes:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 05:25:48PM +0800, Jiankang Yao wrote:
> > 
> > BNAME, which directs both itself and its children, may solve it. the draft 
> about BNAME was discussed 3 years ago.
> 
> > _______________________________________________
> 
> Yes, and if it were compatible with DNSSEC, perhaps people would have
> pursued it.  But it won't work with DNSSEC.

And you know as well as I do that it can be made to work with DNSSEC
the same way as NSEC3 was made to work with DNSSEC.

> Best,
> 
> A
> 
> -- 
> Andrew Sullivan
> [email protected]
> _______________________________________________
> dnsext mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: [email protected]
_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext