Re: [DNSOP] timekeeping and DNSSEC
Ted Lemon <[email protected]> Sat, 26 Oct 2013 14:59:59 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dnsext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Oct 26, 2013, at 8:11 AM, Jim Reid <[email protected]> wrote: > If good timekeeping matters so much to DNSSEC, there are plenty of sources of reliable time. For most people, NTP will be good enough. The paranoid might choose Secure NTP. The really paranoid will have multiple time sources other than GPS: eg the radio clocks operated by many national standards institutes and/or the EU, Russian and Chinese(?) equivalents of GPS. The really, really paranoid will operate their own atomic clocks. While I don't actually disagree with your basic point, I don't think you should gloss over the problem of the RTC-less home gateway that can't trust the network, or, similarly, the constrained device with the same issue. _______________________________________________ dnsext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext