Re: Authenticated denial of existence...
Jelte Jansen <[email protected]> Mon, 25 Nov 2013 17:04:39 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dnsext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 11/25/2013 04:59 PM, Tony Finch wrote: > Jelte Jansen <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> now that you quote it like that, I think that using 'allowed' in that >> first line is misleading; it's not so much that the protocol doesn't >> allow on-line signing, the requirement was that it didn't have to rely >> on it. Also, IIRC the preferred term was on-the-fly rather than on-line. > > Good points. What's the best opposite for on-the-fly? Pre-signed? > I guess so, or maybe pre-generated in a slightly wider context Jelte _______________________________________________ dnsext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext