Re: [[email protected]: [dns-dir] Heads up on a London BoF]
"Hosnieh Rafiee" <[email protected]> Sat, 25 Jan 2014 13:53:49 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dnsext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, At least for IPv6, this is possible by using both asymetric and symetric encryption. One solution might be the use of CGA-TSIG (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rafiee-intarea-cga-tsig ). I wrote a paper about it and called it CGA-TSIGe (e represents encryption) How? 1- Client asks for a public key of the server 2- Server answers with his own public key that is binded to his IP address 3- Client encrypt a session key using the public key of the server and also encrypt the whole message using this session key and also can generate a signature and sign the whole message. 4- server receive this message and decrypt the session key using his own private key and decrypt the whole message using this session key. I also evaluted the encryption and decryption using a public key cryptography. If the message size or the session key is small(less than 100 bytes) then the encryption is in microseconds. Security Analysis of this approach - Nobody can spoof the public key of the server since there is a binding between this public key and the server's IP address - It provides both data integrity and confidentiality Disadvantage - It only supports IPv6 since CGA or SSAS that is the main algorithm in this approach is supported by IPv6 Smile, Hosnieh P.S. I would need to update the draft and will do this soon. > -----Original Message----- > From: dnsext [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Andrew Sullivan > Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2014 3:12 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [dnsext] [[email protected]: [dns-dir] Heads up on a London > BoF] > > Dear colleagues, > > Please see Brian's note below. It will be important to get people with protocol > expertise into this room. > > A > > ----- Forwarded message from Brian Haberman <[email protected]> --- > -- > > Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 08:31:19 -0500 > From: Brian Haberman <[email protected]> > To: IETF DNS Directorate <[email protected]> > Subject: [dns-dir] Heads up on a London BoF > List-Id: IETF DNS directorate discussion list <dns-dir.ietf.org> > > All, > I have agreed to sponsor a BoF in London to look into adding confidentiality > to DNS. The current description of the DNSE BoF is available at: > > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/trac/wiki/WikiStart#Internet > > I want to encourage the DNS protocol experts to participate in the BoF. > The primary focus will be on discussing whether there are existing ways to > accomplish the goals described in the problem statement draft targeted for > the DNSOP WG. > > If you have any questions, feel free to let me know. > > Regards, > Brian > > > > > _______________________________________________ > dns-dir mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-dir > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > -- > Andrew Sullivan > [email protected] > _______________________________________________ > dnsext mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext _______________________________________________ dnsext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext