Re: OPENPGPKEY RRTYPE review - [IANA #773394]

On 08/10/2014 04:41 AM, Jay Daley wrote:
> It would be helpful if the draft was updated to reflect the discussion on the list.

I am unsure which discussion items you think should be added to the draft?

- Comments about revoked keys? The draft does not specify anything but the openpgpk key format. Possibly this item could go into the openpgpkey-usage document,
but would have no effect to the OPENPGPKEY record format.

- combining _openpgpkey and _smimecert ? I do not think there is anything gained my merging the namespaces. It would just hinder opengpgp and smime
clients/plug-ins in discarding irrelevant data.

- comments about not using the APEX or justifying the _openpgpkey prefix? I don't think that belongs in the final document.

- referencing 1035's "weak encoding of email address" and explaining why it is unusable. Can be added, although I think the draft already explains the problem
when it states why it is using a sha2-224 hash.

- small textual improvements suggested by Joe Abbley - Can be added to the next draft, but should that hold up this RRTYPE review? I don't think so.


Did I miss anything in particular that you thought needed to be added?

Paul

_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext