Re: OPENPGPKEY RRTYPE review - [IANA #773394]

On 11 Aug 2014, at 17:18, Joe Abley <[email protected]> wrote:

> In this case, there's no actual need for the wg to be formally involved at all; this could easily progress on its own merits as an individual effort (and it's not a working group draft).

Arrgh, I hit cancel quite a lot after I accidentally hit send, but apparently to no avail. With a name starting with draft-ietf-dane, this seems quite a lot like a wg document, in fact.

Here, let me distract you from the above with this amusing ASCII art, which surely will not render accurately in 98% of the mail clients wishing I hadn't bothered:

  )\._.,--....,'``.
  /,   _.. \   _\  (`._ ,.
 `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'  [Felix Lee <[email protected]>]

And leave the following pithy residue in your mimd instead:

> Not every RRType specification needs to turn into War and Peace.

You're welcome.


Joe
_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext