Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6840 (4191)
Olafur Gudmundsson <[email protected]> Tue, 2 Dec 2014 16:06:45 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dnsext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I agree the text Ed supplied is clearer to outsiders and has the same meaning to insiders as the original text. I recommend you approve the errata. Olafur > On Dec 2, 2014, at 3:21 PM, Brian Haberman <[email protected]> wrote: > > Despite Donald's assertion, I think this is a valid erratum and should > be marked Verified. However, I will wait for others to chime in on the > subject before doing so. > > Regards, > Brian > > On 12/2/14 11:36 AM, RFC Errata System wrote: >> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6840, >> "Clarifications and Implementation Notes for DNS Security (DNSSEC)". >> >> -------------------------------------- >> You may review the report below and at: >> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6840&eid=4191 >> >> -------------------------------------- >> Type: Editorial >> Reported by: Edward Lewis <[email protected]> >> >> Section: 5.11 >> >> Original Text >> ------------- >> ... >> >> A signed zone MUST include a DNSKEY for each algorithm present in >> the zone's DS RRset and expected trust anchors for the zone. The >> zone MUST also be signed with each algorithm (though not each key) >> present in the DNSKEY RRset. >> >> Corrected Text >> -------------- >> A signed zone MUST include a DNSKEY for each algorithm present in >> the zone's DS RRset and expected trust anchors for the zone. Each >> authoritative RRset in the zone MUST be signed with each >> algorithm (though not each key) present in the DNSKEY RRset. >> >> Notes >> ----- >> Zones aren't signed (per se), the data sets within them are. But not cut point (NS) and glue. >> >> Instructions: >> ------------- >> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please >> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or >> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) >> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. >> >> -------------------------------------- >> RFC6840 (draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-20) >> -------------------------------------- >> Title : Clarifications and Implementation Notes for DNS Security (DNSSEC) >> Publication Date : February 2013 >> Author(s) : S. Weiler, Ed., D. Blacka, Ed. >> Category : PROPOSED STANDARD >> Source : DNS Extensions >> Area : Internet >> Stream : IETF >> Verifying Party : IESG >> > _______________________________________________ dnsext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext