Re: Middleboxes and EDNS(0)

Brian Dickson <[email protected]> Sun, 14 Dec 2014 14:42:56 -0800
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.dnsext
Message-ID <CAH1iCir3F34qSzd+Th4c9QA1pB+3WGYCkAtoBdiHg-YNnjfFmg@mail.gmail.com>
My read would be, use the second quote.

I suspect the first quote is referring to caching forwarding DNS servers,
not dumb non-caching middle boxes.

I think any other interpretation creates an actual paradox, while this
reading does not.

And I think it is the only thing that enables OPT (EDNS) to work.

Brian

On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote:

> Greetings again. Section 6.1.1.1 of RFC 6891 says:
>
>    OPT RRs MUST NOT be cached,
>    forwarded, or stored in or loaded from master files.
>
> Section 6.2.6 says:
>
>    Middleboxes that simply forward requests to a recursive resolver MUST
>    NOT modify and MUST NOT delete the OPT record contents in either
>    direction.
>
> If I'm a middlebox that is acting as a DNS forwarder, and I see an OPT RR
> on a query coming in my left side, what do I send that OPT RR out the right
> side? Do I follow the first or the second quote?
>
> --Paul Hoffman
> _______________________________________________
> dnsext mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext
>

_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext