Re: Middleboxes and EDNS(0)
Brian Dickson <[email protected]> Sun, 14 Dec 2014 14:42:56 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dnsext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAH1iCir3F34qSzd+Th4c9QA1pB+3WGYCkAtoBdiHg-YNnjfFmg@mail.gmail.com> |
My read would be, use the second quote. I suspect the first quote is referring to caching forwarding DNS servers, not dumb non-caching middle boxes. I think any other interpretation creates an actual paradox, while this reading does not. And I think it is the only thing that enables OPT (EDNS) to work. Brian On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote: > Greetings again. Section 6.1.1.1 of RFC 6891 says: > > OPT RRs MUST NOT be cached, > forwarded, or stored in or loaded from master files. > > Section 6.2.6 says: > > Middleboxes that simply forward requests to a recursive resolver MUST > NOT modify and MUST NOT delete the OPT record contents in either > direction. > > If I'm a middlebox that is acting as a DNS forwarder, and I see an OPT RR > on a query coming in my left side, what do I send that OPT RR out the right > side? Do I follow the first or the second quote? > > --Paul Hoffman > _______________________________________________ > dnsext mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext > _______________________________________________ dnsext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext