TTL on DS records
"Wessels, Duane" <[email protected]> Sat, 21 Feb 2015 01:19:04 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dnsext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--===============4361551080484942247== Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9D36D4C2-06A9-44EC-B199-1495EB7FB495"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 --Apple-Mail=_9D36D4C2-06A9-44EC-B199-1495EB7FB495 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Section 5 of RFC 4034 says: The DS RR has no special TTL requirements. While RFC 4035 Section 2.4 says: The TTL of a DS RRset SHOULD match the TTL of the delegating NS RRset Due the "SHOULD" I'm not sure this is worthy of an errata, but seems = rather unfortunate. Apologies if this is a previously known issue. DW --Apple-Mail=_9D36D4C2-06A9-44EC-B199-1495EB7FB495 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJU590JAAoJEGyZpGmowJiNPpYH/2WcYQ+ZYbuh0RlOoQeJmeBw YRf5TzHLM6ajIqVqZv4X3RDycWErFSHLuWQg7fHp7zkRo63Apc9lroaRC12otXIA rhvy8iUUDWhK5DA0DHR6A3IA8iHLVYDtxBWdYbRbeA9aqJ7XYHZlT4NRsgxuCeTe 3V/WDpgW3mAvtH5tyv8sloY9CpDRnZfifQH/fviZCbJwhXYEf9jhEa0P+PWDxWMM uuC3zIE97qUJ2ITVNNPZ0T1obR5Gr/oJGDkYeIMDxiJiM+JLKnHlsIahEaEarwWh vqzjjBXh1fQuNV5Q/eQL5crn5IbR1XS/4gm+33DBl1rueVVPcuh1ATt0Wkuhb8k= =AWvS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_9D36D4C2-06A9-44EC-B199-1495EB7FB495-- --===============4361551080484942247== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ dnsext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext --===============4361551080484942247==--