Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4343 (5112)

"John Levine" <[email protected]> 12 Sep 2017 22:15:00 -0000
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.dnsext
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I would reject this or at most mark it as hold for update.  The word
"should" in lower case appears in two other places where it's not used
in the 2119 sense, and I think this one is not intended to be the 2119
sense either.  The sentence in question is describing the historical
situation, and the following capital MUSTs tell you what to do.  

Having said that, if we ever revisit this document, it would benefit
from rewording to make it clearer when it is telling you what to do
and when it's just giving background.

R's,
John



In article <[email protected]> you write:
>The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4343,
>"Domain Name System (DNS) Case Insensitivity Clarification".
>
>--------------------------------------
>You may review the report below and at:
>http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5112
>
>--------------------------------------
>Type: Editorial
>Reported by: Change "should" to must in section 3.(no subsection) <[email protected]>
>
>Section: 3
>
>Original Text
>-------------
>comparisons on name lookup for DNS queries should be case insensitive
>
>Corrected Text
>--------------
>comparisons on name lookup for DNS queries must be case insensitive
>
>Notes
>-----
>Some authoritative DNS servers and/or mitigation devices/software silently drop queries that have
>uppercase letters in them.  Furthermore, the clarification of the case insensitive comparison in the
>following two sentences after that particular sentence use the term MUST.  I suspect some readers of the
>RFC are reading the word "should" and aren't reading the rest of the paragraph.
>
>Instructions:
>-------------
>This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
>can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
>
>--------------------------------------
>RFC4343 (draft-ietf-dnsext-insensitive-06)
>--------------------------------------
>Title               : Domain Name System (DNS) Case Insensitivity Clarification
>Publication Date    : January 2006
>Author(s)           : D. Eastlake 3rd
>Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>Source              : DNS Extensions
>Area                : Internet
>Stream              : IETF
>Verifying Party     : IESG
>
>_______________________________________________
>dnsext mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext
>


_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext