[DNSOP] Re: New I-D: Agent Discovery Protocol (ADP) — DNS-based Agent discovery

Ross Gibson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.dnsop
Message-ID <CACizFXBpdOkHrc7qVFRZNXUHM2v1HScwFjRMbzRR-MhDSC6c6w@mail.gmail.com>
The use of the SVCB record, which better fits service discovery, as the
primary mechanism makes more sense to me.  An SVCB-first approach is what
is proposed by DNS-AID (
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mozleywilliams-dnsop-dnsaid/
),  which takes advantage of where the protocol is today.  Why create yet
another use case for TXT records, which have already been put in to use for
a multitude of different purposes, when there are better-suited options
available?



Thanks,
Ross

On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 12:37 PM Bin Lian <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi all,
> We've submitted draft-pro-adp-agent-discovery-00, which defines a
> lightweight three-layer discovery protocol for AI Agents using DNS
> TXT/SRV records (Section 4), Well-Known URIs (Section 5), and
> WebSocket endpoints (Section 6).
> The key idea: domain names as decentralized Agent identities, with
> public key fingerprint bound in DNS for first-meeting trust.
> We'd appreciate feedback on the DNS record usage and the security
> model.
> Link: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-pro-adp-agent-discovery/
> Repo: https://github.com/harrylian8766/adp-protocol
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.