[DNSOP] Re: New Internet-Drafts: DNS-anchored identity dis covery for autonomous agents (Groundmark)

Hi Mark,
At 06:40 AM 14-06-2026, Mark E. Jeftovic wrote:
>No, our intent is not fixed on publishing 
>through the Independent Submission Stream. We 
>submitted the current -00 as individual 
>Internet-Drafts, and are bringing the DNS-layer 
>design to DNSOP specifically to get WG review 
>and guidance on the appropriate path.
>
>If the WG believes the work belongs in DNSOP, we 
>would be happy to pursue that path, including WG 
>adoption if there is interest and consensus. If 
>the WG thinks another path is more appropriate, 
>we would welcome that guidance as well.
>
>The "Independent Submission" label in the 
>current draft was an artifact of earlier 
>authoring/template work and should be treated as 
>a header mistake. We can correct it in the next revision.

Thanks for the above information.

According to Section 1 of 
draft-noss-jeftovic-groundmark-core-00, the 
proposal is related to X402.  There are other 
proposals related to X402.  A x402 Foundation is 
expected to be established.  My guess is that 
someone would have to talk to the appropriate 
contact at that end to find out what to do about those proposals.

The DNS angle is quite straight-forward given 
that there is already 14 "TXT" registrations in 
the "Underscored and Globally Scoped DNS Node 
Names" registry (RFC 8552).  If I am not 
mistaken, the requests are sent through IANA lately.

The DNSOP question could be about the TTL of 
"_agentclaim" records (Section 4.2 of the draft).

Section 7 of the draft explains why DNSSEC validation is required.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy 

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]