[DNSOP] Re: How black are black lies, really?

Max Hearnden <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.dnsop
Message-ID <[email protected]>
To give an example of a user, Let's Encrypt are currently the unbound 
option of harden-below-nxdomain 
(https://community.letsencrypt.org/t/minor-dnssec-validation-change/246329) 
which implements RFC 8020 for DNSSEC signed domains.

On 18/06/2026 22:59, John R Levine wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jun 2026, Olafur Gudmundsson wrote:
>> In the 10 years that “X lies” have been in use there has only been 
>> minimal set of complaints all all of them from
>> end-user tools, no complaints about behavior of resolvers or 
>> forwarders, as they only care about one thing:
>> “Does the record being asked about exist?” full stop.
>>
>> The existence of the name is a wider scope that only end-user-tools 
>> may care about.
>
> You don't know anyone who's using RFC 8020?  I'm not snarking, it's a 
> real question.
>
> R's,
> John
>
> PS: THe urge is great to subit an erratum for 8020 which replaces the 
> entire text sith "just kidding."
>
PS: There was another copy of this email sent from an address that can't 
send mail to the IETF, please disregard it.

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.