[DNSOP] Re: How black are black lies, really?
Max Hearnden <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dnsop |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
To give an example of a user, Let's Encrypt are currently the unbound option of harden-below-nxdomain (https://community.letsencrypt.org/t/minor-dnssec-validation-change/246329) which implements RFC 8020 for DNSSEC signed domains. On 18/06/2026 22:59, John R Levine wrote: > On Thu, 18 Jun 2026, Olafur Gudmundsson wrote: >> In the 10 years that “X lies” have been in use there has only been >> minimal set of complaints all all of them from >> end-user tools, no complaints about behavior of resolvers or >> forwarders, as they only care about one thing: >> “Does the record being asked about exist?” full stop. >> >> The existence of the name is a wider scope that only end-user-tools >> may care about. > > You don't know anyone who's using RFC 8020? I'm not snarking, it's a > real question. > > R's, > John > > PS: THe urge is great to subit an erratum for 8020 which replaces the > entire text sith "just kidding." > PS: There was another copy of this email sent from an address that can't send mail to the IETF, please disregard it. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]