[DNSOP] Re: Client authentication for encrypted DNS — interest check
Bill Woodcock <[email protected]> Sat, 11 Jul 2026 02:21:35 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dnsop |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On Jul 11, 2026, at 02:18, Aitor Santos <[email protected]> wrote: > Transport-layer authentication within the TLS handshake is simpler and more robust — no tunnel management, no IP churn problem. > The draft isn't trying to replace VPN — it's about the cases where VPN is operationally out of scope. Exactly. This isn’t what VPNs are for, this is what authentication is for. This is why we don’t make everyone who uses email run their IMAP through a VPN, and everyone who uses the web run their HTTPS through a VPN. -Bill _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEm6XJ0FdpKWJHso4lb6RwSyiLf4cFAmpRjI8ACgkQb6RwSyiL f4cE3A//cBtW5ziUfAa+8rTNt6q6nq8E69LDlRXCzhMmlT4QkCkemzbG5vmuHxJf 0NMYhhVzAeITKuwh/4VEaR9eFUeJL4XhvVFChTJBufXiEJk5woo1i2e79Bu1ambU dJ0ybhZHjHtNlkKaO/jdww38VGRldJ39IIa19wkBEOF0WSN4S1+uFvkH02g/54Fb RPfuTz8oefj7VMXYdLLsdSKy0ZxLMwZspj1YNbB73c58qiT493lIIuzsKwUqRTvZ j+HU9KGUW6OD2JSOD3V+SZkl6E94Ny+Rz6V/s5bV7YcA5XtDmoRJXIi7RYIOrOY6 2OBctOluiZOPDbf1Gj7SEFtYcGryLuzrdftpPxa64xWfjRyrMbpl3c1h67Fl/gbv mtwVyove4ihSI1J3+apUac80dBSP8CzzqhqyIUiuYfVrLyXxl7r+fDyoxBpBDeEs 86OOfpCrkCo9E/xqEo99eawj5FJQPl+KZgpvuKX+X9ffU0fjwZAfz38PSKmK65De rslA5mFXG3KvL9CFpF/lowSGDgfj6xDmbGNiPL2oV5sPMGC3gY0PcSwAtIzwGnji MuylXHkov71T8KsOTNaeNQu2mFmXPfjmJWJjiCPIAMBuzdO6wyPB/oQuKJAU6bM2 uar1D/5Af9daUOId8e0hWt0ul4AqpfacRvYYPKp2RqdotNIKXCE= =RNfK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----