[DNSOP] Re: Call for adoption: draft-nottingham-dnsop-cens orship-transparency-01 (Ends 2026-07-23)

Loganaden Velvindron <[email protected]> Mon, 13 Jul 2026 23:19:42 +0400
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.dnsop
Message-ID <CAOp4FwQDhHmXguxtQshTCNVoRXAT4+1-Skg4sbRyvzv8qypZ0g@mail.gmail.com>
I also support adoption.



On Mon, 13 Jul 2026 at 16:01, Joe Abley <jabley=
[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I support adoption.
>
> The reasons for having a mechanism at all seem clear, and the benefits of
interoperability seem obvious. This builds on other work done in dnsop and
hence seems like a reasonable place for it to be discussed.
>
>
> > On 9 Jul 2026, at 21:53, Benno Overeinder via Datatracker <
[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > This message starts a dnsop WG Call for Adoption of:
> > draft-nottingham-dnsop-censorship-transparency-01
> >
> > This Working Group Call for Adoption ends on 2026-07-23
> >
> > Abstract:
> >   [I-D.ietf-dnsop-structured-dns-error] introduces structured error
> >   data for DNS responses that have been filtered.  This specification
> >   allows more specific details of filtering incidents to be conveyed.
> >
> > Discussion Venues
> >
> >   This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.
> >
> >   Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at
> >   https://github.com/mnot/public-resolver-errors.
> >
> > Please reply to this message and indicate whether or not you support
adoption
> > of this Internet-Draft by the dnsop WG. Comments to explain your
preference
> > are greatly appreciated. Please reply to all recipients of this message
and
> > include this message in your response.
> >
> > Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded of the
Intellectual
> > Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79 [2].
> > Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the
provisions
> > of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of any.
> > Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can
be
> > found at [3].
> >
> > Thank you.
> > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/
> > [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/
> > [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/
> >
> > The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
> >
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nottingham-dnsop-censorship-transparency/
> >
> > There is also an HTML version available at:
> >
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-nottingham-dnsop-censorship-transparency-01.html
> >
> > A diff from the previous version is available at:
> >
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-nottingham-dnsop-censorship-transparency-01
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]