[DNSOP] Re: draft-ietf-dnsop-delext and non-useful parent-si de types

Moin!

On 22 Jul 2026, at 20:00, Peter Thomassen wrote:

> Hi David,
>
> On 7/22/26 19:53, Blacka, David wrote:
>> So, the question is: do we want delext to make it possible to define
>> new parent-side types that work with NS? or are we ok that all new
>> delegation types either need to be DELEG successors or be served
>> with DELEG?
>
> I'd strongly prefer the former: it will be almost no work to take this into account now, in comparison to when we don't but need it later.

This was discussed early on in DELEG, and the consensus then was because every NS can be represented by a DELEG record that we did not need it. We then had a discussion if this should synthesised automatically and if this should be part of the spec and we said that this is implementation dependant and we should not describe it.

So long
-Ralf
———
Ralf Weber

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]