[DNSOP] Re: draft-ietf-dnsop-delext and non-useful parent-si de types

It appears that Tim Wicinski  <[email protected]> said:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>So, the question is: do we want delext to make it possible to define
>
>new parent-side types that work with NS?

I'm having no luck coming up with a plausible use case. Any DS2 type will be
newer than DELEG, so any resolver that understands DS2 will presumably also
understand DELEG.

I'm trying to imagine a reason you'd take a pre-DELEG resolver and hack DS2
support into it rather adding it to your current DELEG-aware resolver.  But
my imagination isn't that good.

R's,
John

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]