[DNSOP] Re: [Ext] Re: New I-D: Transparent Handling of IDNs in Name Resolution APIs (draft-rodenhaeuser-idna-transp arent-resolution-00)
Paul Hoffman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dnsop |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Aug 12, 2026, at 08:25, Luca Rodenhäuser <[email protected]> wrote: > > I posted this draft on 20 July, during IETF 126, and it drew no > discussion. Following a suggestion from the WG secretary, I would like > to ask explicitly: is this work of interest to the group, and if not, > what are the concerns? My primary concern is that this document create a new requirement 20+ years after the creating of IDNs. My secondary concern is that you are tying this to a static version of the Unicode Standard. My tertiary concern is that the draft indicates that there is agreement in the IETF IDN community on the correct direction to go, and that is absolutely false. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]