[DNSOP] Re: Call for adoption: draft-huque-dnsop-multi-alg -rules-08 (Ends 2026-08-31)
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dnsop |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Philip Homburg <[email protected]> wrote: >> This is a I want a pony draft. It will not work for every validator. >> Validator operators shouldnt have to add NTAs, assuming that there >> implementation supports them, because people are to lazy to do due >> diligence when moving operators. > This is a weird use of the concept 'pony'. It causes problems for the small > percentage of people running validators that haven't been update for more > than a decade. Those validators cannot validate half of the DNSSEC Lest someone wonder why anyone would have such an old validator... A reason is because one has to unarchive some ancient VM (or container) in order to validate a bug in some old system. Or worse, because one needs the toolchain contained within in order to build a patch for some old (in the field) system. And the first thing that happens is that one needs a few new things inside the VM, the absolute last patches to gcc 11 and openssl 1.1.1QAZT... and guess what... the DNS resolver libraries, or **localhost DNS-validator** inside are also old. The VM won't be alive very long, and isn't exposed otherwise to the network... {I recently had to bisect a node v16 thing with react-js 16, against a dependancy that broke with newer stuff. } I find that this is one of the serious downsides of Docker: it trivially and often unknowingly locks down ancient code. The SBOM part of it is not yet used enough for knowing what's broken. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide ** My working hours and your working hours may be different. ** ** Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours ** _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 487 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEbsyLEzg/qUTA43uogItw+93Q3WUFAmqAu30ACgkQgItw+93Q 3WXcmggAtjtVvL+DqoaZ3vBkNrceQcfqFN+QYTO2l4CGuBqOicwazrKEhDuK4YUL J350M9Ofu7uovsRR/22GmkEHVPXbvgY5K5Y+6C1T/1AmfNS7c/2InwM0HGan4cmD VdBCffHWQomFykvThICs5z7vLEkREzjejwYoZqF9NSnF4PKKsMYIS1rZ1Nxs3k6B PFjn2yf567tAey5Yx3TFpCS0ZuDg2BiS2m0u+FzK6Z27vyomS/VAz4HX75ZfXGv5 xWI9szFmovULu1scM6H3ji8XC/PkvLbF4qVWWVnPqqlnfZTiKm83bzmoBpTP7zOj bXaafBrwxy8rS2jzxfeEHW7bDdVATw== =yXlH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----