[DNSOP] Re: Call for adoption: draft-huque-dnsop-multi-alg -rules-08 (Ends 2026-08-31)

Michael Richardson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.dnsop
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Philip Homburg <[email protected]> wrote:
    >> This is a I want a pony draft. It will not work for every validator.
    >> Validator operators shouldnt have to add NTAs, assuming that there
    >> implementation supports them, because people are to lazy to do due
    >> diligence when moving operators.

    > This is a weird use of the concept 'pony'. It causes problems for the small
    > percentage of people running validators that haven't been update for more
    > than a decade. Those validators cannot validate half of the DNSSEC

Lest someone wonder why anyone would have such an old validator...

A reason is because one has to unarchive some ancient VM (or container) in
order to validate a bug in some old system.  Or worse, because one needs the
toolchain contained within in order to build a patch for some old (in the
field) system.

And the first thing that happens is that one needs a few new things inside
the VM, the absolute last patches to gcc 11 and openssl 1.1.1QAZT... and
guess what... the DNS resolver libraries, or **localhost DNS-validator**
inside are also old.   The VM won't be alive very long, and isn't exposed
otherwise to the network...

{I recently had to bisect a node v16 thing with react-js 16, against a
dependancy that broke with newer stuff. }

I find that this is one of the serious downsides of Docker: it trivially and
often unknowingly locks down ancient code.  The SBOM part of it is not yet
used enough for knowing what's broken.

--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

**       My working hours and your working hours may be different.         **
** Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours **

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 487 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEbsyLEzg/qUTA43uogItw+93Q3WUFAmqAu30ACgkQgItw+93Q
3WXcmggAtjtVvL+DqoaZ3vBkNrceQcfqFN+QYTO2l4CGuBqOicwazrKEhDuK4YUL
J350M9Ofu7uovsRR/22GmkEHVPXbvgY5K5Y+6C1T/1AmfNS7c/2InwM0HGan4cmD
VdBCffHWQomFykvThICs5z7vLEkREzjejwYoZqF9NSnF4PKKsMYIS1rZ1Nxs3k6B
PFjn2yf567tAey5Yx3TFpCS0ZuDg2BiS2m0u+FzK6Z27vyomS/VAz4HX75ZfXGv5
xWI9szFmovULu1scM6H3ji8XC/PkvLbF4qVWWVnPqqlnfZTiKm83bzmoBpTP7zOj
bXaafBrwxy8rS2jzxfeEHW7bDdVATw==
=yXlH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.